[Maxima] Lambert W function?
robert.dodier at gmail.com
Tue May 20 23:00:39 CDT 2008
On 5/20/08, Viktor T. Toth <vttoth at vttoth.com> wrote:
> But please bear with me while I play the Devil's advocate for a moment. This
> gradef business works both ways. From the practical perspective of most
> Maxima users, algebraic simplification is probably a lot more important than
> having a derivative that avoids removable singularities. Is that not a
> sufficient reason to define the "stock version" of the derivative of
> Lambert's W like Maple does?
Oh, I don't have a preference as to the default version of the derivative.
I'm just saying that whatever it is, it should be changed by gradef instead
of a flag.
More information about the Maxima